$COPPER $COPPER

What $COPPER actually is on-chain

$COPPER is an SPL token deployed on Solana, at contract address 2pASaZVMQCusTpUc6MdfFBXSML9yKeJQZGLf8L8RyYwQ. That address, not the ticker $COPPER, is what uniquely identifies this asset: anyone can deploy a second token calling itself $COPPER, but the contract is unforgeable. Verify it against solscan.io before sending funds or approving a spend.

On Solana the token account model means $COPPER is held in an associated token account derived from the mint above, and a wallet has to be rent-funded in SOL before it can receive the token at all. Fees are a fraction of a cent, so the cost of trading $COPPER is dominated by pool slippage in Raydium and Orca pools, not by gas — the opposite of the EVM case.

For $COPPER the project publishes an active account as @Coppermoonsol. That is a partial paper trail — enough to check claims against, not enough to audit. None of it is a quality judgement about the asset; it is simply what can be independently checked before the chart is worth looking at.

Where $COPPER sits in the market

$COPPER ranks #7393, in the deep tail, among assets that are tracked but rarely quoted, far outside the set of assets that carry continuous market-maker coverage. At this end of the table the first question is data integrity rather than valuation: a quote can originate from a single pool or a single venue, reported volume is difficult to verify independently, and the distance between the last print and a genuinely executable price can be wide. Treat any indicator computed on this series as provisional.

We are not currently receiving a live $COPPER order book from any of the exchanges connected to this site, so no real-time quote is shown above. That is itself information: it usually means the pair is unlisted on the venues we track, or trading has been halted. $COPPER is a Solana asset, so whatever turnover exists is most likely in Raydium and Orca pools rather than on a centralised book, and every fill there costs SOL in gas on top of the pool's own fee.

$COPPER supply and valuation data

At #7393 there is no reliable third-party supply audit for $COPPER at all — token counts this far down the table are frequently restated, and we would rather show nothing than show a number that moves without notice. What we do have is a fully diluted valuation of $58 thousand as of 2026-05-12. That is in the bottom quartile of tracked assets, a range where a single liquidity provider can account for most of the quoted value.

Because that valuation is a snapshot rather than a live figure, we deliberately do not back out a supply number from it — the price has moved since, and the division would produce a confident-looking token count that is simply wrong. Check the project's own explorer for the current supply before using any per-token valuation. The authoritative figure is the one solscan.io reports for this contract.

What kind of asset $COPPER is

$COPPER is a meme asset. There is no cash flow, no fee capture and no fundamental anchor to value it against, which is a description rather than a criticism — it means the price is set entirely by attention and reflexive flow. In practice, volume moves first and price follows, so a volume spike is the leading signal for this class while an oscillator reading is a lagging one. Moves are larger, faster and mean-revert harder than in assets with a revenue story.

CoinGecko files $COPPER under 3 categories, including Solana Ecosystem, Meme, Solana Meme. CoinGecko also records deployments on Solana (3,129 tracked tokens), so its on-chain liquidity and its user base move with that network.

How to set a $COPPER alert that is worth receiving

$COPPER is the SPL token at 2pASaZ…yYwQ on Solana — high dated 2025-06-28 — rank #7393. On this profile the condition that carries signal is a volume-surge condition on the 1-hour or 4-hour candle paired with a wide price threshold.

Full alert-design method: thresholds, RSI/MACD and volume conditions →