Everest ID

What ID actually is on-chain

Everest is an ERC-20 deployed on Ethereum, at contract address 0xebd9d99a3982d547c5bb4db7e3b1f9f14b67eb83. That address, not the ticker ID, is what uniquely identifies this asset: anyone can deploy a second token calling itself ID, but the contract is unforgeable. Verify it against etherscan.io before sending funds or approving a spend.

Because it lives on Ethereum, ID is held in any EVM-compatible wallet, transfers are paid for in ETH rather than in ID itself, and secondary liquidity sits in Uniswap-style AMM pools. Two consequences follow for anyone setting alerts: you need ETH in the same wallet to move the token at all, and a quoted price taken from a pool is a pool price — it includes slippage that an order-book quote would not.

2 other assets tracked on this site also use the ticker ID: SPACE ID (BNB Chain, 0x2dff…6406); Integrity DAO (another network, 0x34a5…a577). The asset on this page is specifically the Ethereum deployment at 0xebd9…eb83. These are unrelated tokens with separate contracts, separate supply and separate price histories — a price alert set on one of them says nothing about the others, and a ticker search is not enough to tell them apart.

For ID the project publishes a whitepaper, a public source repository and an active account as @EverestDotOrg. Both a written specification and readable code exist, which is a materially higher bar than most assets in this size range clear. None of it is a quality judgement about the asset; it is simply what can be independently checked before the chart is worth looking at.

Where ID sits in the market

Everest ranks #4041, in the middle of the long tail, where listing status changes more often than price does, far outside the set of assets that carry continuous market-maker coverage. At this end of the table the first question is data integrity rather than valuation: a quote can originate from a single pool or a single venue, reported volume is difficult to verify independently, and the distance between the last print and a genuinely executable price can be wide. Treat any indicator computed on this series as provisional.

CryptoPingAi is currently streaming 6 live ID order books (Binance, OKX, Gate.io, HTX, Upbit, Bithumb). That is wider coverage than most assets ranked near #4041 carry, so a divergence on any one of them is far more likely to be a local liquidity event than a genuine repricing. One of them is a Korean won market, so the Kimchi-premium spread between the KRW and USDT quote is visible on this page.

ID against its all-time high

ID is down more than 95% from its $1.98 peak (on 2021-04-09), leaving a 69.0x gap to reclaim. A drawdown this deep strips the record of analytical use: the supply structure, the holder base and usually the market cycle behind that print no longer exist. For ID the informative reference is the downside, which makes the range section below more relevant than this one. It was set 6 years ago. A reference that old says more about the cycle it belongs to than about the asset as it trades now.

ID across its historical range

ID has traded across a 7,078x range, between $0.00027973 and $1.98. Any volatility figure quoted for this asset depends heavily on which part of that range it is measured over.

At 103x above the $0.00027973 record low (on 2026-04-12), long-term holders sit on returns large enough that ordinary drawdowns do not change their behaviour. Distribution pressure here is a function of holder age, not of the current chart.

ID supply and valuation data

At #4041 there is no reliable third-party supply audit for ID at all — token counts this far down the table are frequently restated, and we would rather show nothing than show a number that moves without notice. What we do have is a fully diluted valuation of $3.0 million as of 2026-05-12. That sits around the middle of the distribution — roughly half the assets tracked here carry a smaller fully diluted value.

That valuation is a point-in-time snapshot, not a live figure, so we deliberately avoid dividing it back into a token count — the price has moved since, and the arithmetic would yield a precise-looking supply number that is simply wrong. Read the current supply from the project's own explorer before relying on any per-token valuation. The authoritative figure is the one etherscan.io reports for this contract.

What kind of asset ID is

Everest sits in the real-world-asset category, where the token is a claim on or a representation of something held off-chain. That makes the relevant risks custodial and regulatory rather than purely market-driven: attestation quality, the identity of the custodian and the legal enforceability of redemption matter more than the chart. RWA assets also tend to move on regulatory news cycles that have nothing to do with the broader crypto tape.

CoinGecko files ID under 7 categories, including Decentralized Finance (DeFi), Wallets, Ethereum Ecosystem, Decentralized Identifier (DID), Zero Knowledge (ZK). CoinGecko also records deployments on Ethereum (3,072 tracked tokens), so its on-chain liquidity and its user base move with that network.

How to set a Everest alert that is worth receiving

Everest is the ERC-20 at 0xebd9…eb83 on Ethereum — quoted on 6 venues we stream — high dated 2021-04-09 — rank #4041. On this profile the condition that carries signal is thresholds anchored to the recent range rather than to the all-time high.

Full alert-design method: thresholds, RSI/MACD and volume conditions →